DOGAMI OPEN-FILE REPORT SERIES
[Go back] | Publications Center | DOGAMI Home
PUBLICATION
PREVIEW
Open-File
Report O-21-06, Natural hazard risk report for Sherman County, Oregon,
including the Cities of Grass Valley, Moro, Rufus, and Wasco,
by Matt C. Williams and Ian P. Madin; 62 p. report, 6
tabloid size map plates, one Esri® geodatabase with internal metadata, external
metadata in .xml format.
What's in this report?
This report describes the methods and results of a natural hazard risk
assessment for Sherman County communities. The risk assessment can help
communities better plan for disaster.
View Story Map
Report downloads:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report was prepared for the communities of Sherman County,
Oregon, with funding provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA). It describes the methods and results of the natural hazard risk
assessment performed in 2018 and 2021 by the Oregon Department of Geology and
Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) within the study area. The purpose of this
project was to provide communities with a detailed understanding of their risk
from natural hazards, to give communities the ability to compare their risk
across multiple hazards, and to prioritize and take actions that will reduce
risk. The results of this study can also inform the natural hazard mitigation
planning process.
We arrived at our findings and conclusions by completing three
main tasks: compiling an asset database, identifying
and using best available hazard data, and performing natural hazard risk
assessment.
To
complete the first task, we created a comprehensive asset database for the
entire study area by synthesizing assessor data, U.S. Census information, Hazus-MH general building stock information, and building
footprint data. This work resulted in a single dataset of building points and
their associated building characteristics. Using this dataset, we were able to
represent accurate spatial location and vulnerability on a building-by-building
basis.
The
second task was to identify and use the most current and appropriate hazard
datasets for the study area. Most of the hazard datasets used in this report
were created by DOGAMI and some were produced using high-resolution lidar
topographic data. While not all the data sources used in the report are
countywide, each hazard dataset was the best available at the time the analysis
was performed.
In
the third task, we performed the risk assessment using Esri® ArcGIS Desktop®
software. We used two risk assessment approaches: (1) estimated loss (in
dollars) to buildings from flood (recurrence intervals) and earthquake
scenarios using FEMA Hazus®-MH methodology, and (2)
calculated number of buildings, their value, and associated populations exposed
to earthquake, flood, landslide, and wildfire hazards.
The
findings and conclusions of this report show the potential impacts of hazards
in communities within Sherman County. An earthquake can cause minor to moderate
damage and losses throughout the county. The communities of Grass Valley and
Moro have moderate risk from flooding, and we quantify the number of elevated
structures that are less vulnerable to flood hazard in the study area. Our
analysis shows that new landslide mapping based on improved methods and lidar
information will increase the accuracy of future risk assessments. During the
time of writing, the best available data show that wildfire risk is high for
the overall study area. Our findings indicate that most of the critical
facilities in the study area are at high risk from an earthquake and wildfire.
We also note that the biggest causes of population displacement are wildfire
and flood hazards. Lastly, we demonstrate that this risk assessment can be a
valuable tool to local decisionmakers.
Results were broken out for the following geographic areas:
Selected Study Area Results |
|
2,500-year
Probabilistic Magnitude 7.0 Earthquake |
100-year
Flood Scenario |
Landslide
Exposure (High and Very High Susceptibility) |
Wildfire
Exposure (High Risk) |
aRed-tagged buildings are considered to be uninhabitable due to complete damage. |
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) DATA
Geodatabase is Esri® version 10.2 format.
Metadata is embedded in the geodatabase and is also provided as separate .xml
formatted files.
Each dataset listed below has an associated, standalone .xml
file containing metadata in the Federal Geographic Data Committee Content
Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata format.
Sherman_County_Risk_Report_Data.gdb: |
||
Feature
dataset: Asset_Data: |
|
|
Building_footprints |
polygons |
|
Communities |
polygons |
|
UDF_points |
points |
APPENDIX E: MAP PLATES (PDFs, 17 x 11
inches each)
Plate
1, Building Distribution Map of Sherman County, Oregon (4.6
MB PDF)
Plate
2, Population Density Map of Sherman County, Oregon (5
MB PDF)
Plate
3, CSZ Mw 9.0
Earthquake Shaking Map of Sherman County, Oregon (6
MB PDF)
Plate 4, Flood Hazard Map of Sherman
County, Oregon
(5.6 MB PDF)
Plate
5, Landslide Susceptibility Map of Sherman County, Oregon (5
MB PDF)
Plate
6, Wildfire Hazard Map of Sherman County, Oregon (5
MB PDF)